Much of the world has disparaged Israel's celebration of its 60th year of independence (renewed independence, actually) by claiming, as one Connecticut newspaper columnist did the other day, that the country "was built over the debris of 400 destroyed villages and the sorrows of 750,000 people, both Christians and Muslims, expelled from their land."

Yes, Israel's re-establishment in 1948 had its dislocations, Jews going here, Muslims going there, and Christians caught in the middle. But not all these dislocations were expulsions. And if the whole Middle East is counted, there have been far more expulsions of Jews than of anyone else. In any case complaints about the dislocations in Israel's re-establishment presume that the planet was delivered to humanity straight from the factory with its national borders already marked on it and that the return of Israel was a smudge on the natural order of things. In fact, of course, most of today's national borders were established either by war or colonialism. Some make sense now; many still don't.

Even though its re-establishment in 1948 involved war, Israel can claim far more legitimacy than most countries. For unlike most countries today Israel was re-established by resolution of the international organization, the United Nations. Israel's neighbors refused to accept the U.N. resolution and immediately went to war against the new country, and then twice more, in 1967 and 1973, always to deny Israel's legitimacy. But unlike most nations victorious in war, Israel has either given back or has been looking for safe ways of giving away most of the territory it conquered.

As much as the dislocations arising from Israel's re-establishment obsess certain people today, they are tiny compared to dislocations that are hardly noticed anymore. For example, just a year before Israel's re-establishment, British-ruled India was partitioned, by act of Parliament and consensus among the colony's political classes, into Hindu and Muslim sectors, the former becoming independent India and the latter becoming Pakistan. This partition uprooted about 15 million people and cost about a half million lives, through ethnic violence, expropriation, and exhaustion. The resentments arising from the partition of India endure today and continue to cost as many lives every year as the Israeli-Palestinian conflict does, but no one outside India and Pakistan seems to care.

Of course Europe, where criticism of Israel's anniversary may be strongest, has partitioned itself too many times to count, with peoples and nations pushed north, south, east, and west over the centuries. From Finland down to Yugoslavia –– whoops, Serbia now –– it is impossible to walk more than a few miles without crossing what, within the last 200 years, used to be a national border or without finding a town whose name wasn't different not long ago.

Anyone aggrieved that the areas that are supposed to become the Palestinian homeland –– the West Bank and Gaza –– are separated by 20 miles of Israel might check the map of the Indian subcontinent, where 1,500 miles separate what used to be the two Pakistans (now Pakistan and Bangladesh), or the map of Europe, where Russia's Kaliningrad province is 300 miles from Russia proper, cut off by Lithuania and Latvia.

While Israel, the size of Connecticut, is supposed to return to Syria the Golan Heights, smaller than Rhode Island, China is keeping the vastness of Tibet, which it seized in 1959. And, having made five states out of the territory it seized by war in 1848, the United States won't be returning Alta California to Mexico any time soon.

Traces of vanished, persecuted, dispersed, and murdered aboriginal peoples can be found in practically every country –– that's what Connecticut's Indian casinos are supposed to be about –– but everyone is forgiven except for the Jews, who instead are constantly ducking rocket fire and curses for clinging to their tiny strip along the eastern Mediterranean. Call it tribalism if you want, but that is to be blind to the tribalism that surrounds Israel, a tribalism that, unlike any Israeli tribalism, preaches extinction.

That Connecticut newspaper columnist approvingly quoted a letter written by a hundred anti-Israel British Jews denouncing the country's anniversary: "We will celebrate when Arabs and Jews live as equals in a peaceful Middle East." Of course such equality is to be attempted first not by democratizing Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, or Iran but by erasing the border that protects the smallest tribe so that it falls under the sovereignty of the very nations that drove it out and then three times waged war against it.

Any such peace will be only the peace of the grave –– which has been the idea all along.

Siiiiiigh!!!!....Nothing i tire of more than hearing the words "Peace" and "islam" in the same sentence,even the same topic and subject.Get a clue.Israel do what you gotta do.

I posted something a short time back that deals with the percentage of muslims within a host Country and thier actions when the muslim population reaches certain percentages.Basicly chart the rot rate as the disease of islam contaminates it's healthy host.

Just a little note and reminder.Hitler had far fewer people willing to cary out his plan than islam has to carry out it's plans.People gasp/ed at the Muslim Brotherhoods plans to destroy the west by it's own hands ( should have gasped anyways.) but really it is just the same plan that has caused the downfall of every other civilization islam has come in contact with and who either no longer exist or barely exist or are on the verge of not existing.

The percentages and thier effects are not made up pipe dreams,they have been proven as fact ,we have seen it happen.

                                 Jihad by the Numbers

In his masterful second volume study of Hitler, Hitler, 1936-1945: Nemesis, Ian Kershaw discusses a phenomenon called "working towards the Führer," in which every Nazi Party organization, member and office automatically, with little or no prompting or prodding by Hitler or his inner circle, worked to realize the ends and policies articulated by Hitler before and after he rose to power in 1933. It was automatic, because to disagree with or have reservations about a single, even minor aspect of Nazi ideology was to court reprimand, censure, dismissal, or even death. Agreement with those ends and policies was nearly a secondary motivation behind any Party member's actions. He was compelled to act, regardless of the consequences. The ideology commanded it, and the Führer's will and vision were irresistible, because there was little or no self to resist them.

As Party members who disagreed or expressed reservations were dismissed, or abandoned the Party, fled, committed suicide, or were murdered, monsters of the first rank filled the vacuum to formulate and enact policies that more completely "worked towards the Führer," monsters such as Heinrich Himmler, Hermann Göring, Joachim von Ribbentrop, and Joseph Goebbels. When all the checks within the Party against total irrationality in domestic and foreign policies were removed or fell into disrepute, total irrationality took over totally.

But the average Party member strived to satisfy Hitler, regardless of how minor or major the action and regardless if it stood to be acknowledged or rewarded. To be a true, loyal, above-suspicion Nazi meant the near total surrender of one's ego, mind and self, and to substitute them with Hitler's own.

Of course, an Ellsworth Toohey might say that the joke was on the rank-and-file Nazi: he would claim that Hitler was essentially selfless, and that what little mind Hitler possessed was founded on what he thought his followers and "the people" wanted and expected of him as prophet and dictator. Ayn Rand, in The Fountainhead, describes that phenomenon through Toohey:

"...A world of obedience and of unity. A world where the thought of each man will not be his own, but an attempt to guess the thought in the brain of his neighbor, who'll have no thought of his own but an attempt to guess the thought of the next neighbor who'll have no thought - and so on...around the globe. Since all must serve all. A world in which man will not work for so innocent an incentive as money, but for that headless monster - prestige. The approval of his fellows - their good opinion - the opinion of men who'll be allowed to hold no opinion. An octopus, all tentacles and no brain....An average drawn upon zeroes...." (1).

It is no accident or fluke of history that Islamists - Hamas, Hezbollah, Ahmadinejad, Saudi Wahhabists, the whole ménage of Islamists and Jihadists -- admire both Hitler and Nazism. Their hatred of Jews and Israel is merely one facet of that pathology. As Nazism required the complete submission of the individual to Party ideology and an unthinking, unwavering deference to Hitler, Islam requires the complete submission of the individual to Islam and an unthinking, unwavering deference to Allah and Mohammed. Islamists have long recognized that both the method and the ends of Nazism were in complete agreement and practical accord with their own. The "mechanics" of a functioning Islam differ in no fundamental way from the "mechanics" of a functioning Nazism or any other brand of total collectivism, as described by Toohey above. (2)

(One historical note: Kershaw points out that Hitler once entertained the idea of solving the "Jewish Question" by helping to establish a Jewish state in Palestine, where all German and other European Jews would be forcibly "relocated" and presumably - hopefully - perish in a wasteland of desert and hostile Arabs. He dismissed the idea because he feared that such a state could possibly become a political adversary dedicated to destroying Germany. Historically, the ironic joke is on Hitler. He destroyed Germany and the Jews turned the wasteland into a productive, prosperous garden.)

With that in mind, here is a set of significant statistics forwarded to me by a friend. It charts the progression of Islamic Jihad, both soft and hard methods, whose purpose is to establish a global caliphate, especially in the West.

It begins by stating:

"Islam is not a religion nor is it a cult. It is a complete system."

I would disagree. It is definitely a religion and a political system combined. Any attempt to "separate" mosque and state would emasculate Islam. I have argued this point in past commentaries and will not dwell on it here. And cults, if not opposed by reason and kept by it on the far fringes of a civilized society, have a tendency to become religions that may become state policies. Ecology was once a "cult." Today we have the Environmental Protection Agency.

It goes on to state:

"Islam has religious, legal, political, economic and military components. The religious component is a beard for all the other components."

Or a mask, or a ruse. But no one should doubt how seriously Islamists and Muslims in general take the religious component. Islam is a barbaric but fully integrated system, perhaps more lethally integrated than was Nazism.

"Islamization occurs when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to agitate for their so-called ‘religious rights.'"

I would defend anyone's right to believe in Islam. The question is: How could one truly practice Islam without declaring Jihad on others? After a Muslim has won the "internal struggle" or Jihad within himself, the next step is to wage it against all others. To refrain from that part of Jihad is to risk the accusation of being a slacker or pseudo-Muslim. From the first stage to the last, all such effort constitutes "working towards the Prophet and Allah."

"When politically correct and culturally diverse societies agreed to ‘the reasonable' Muslims demands for their ‘religious rights,' they also get the other components under the table. Here's how it works (percentages source: CIA: The World Fact Book, 2007).

"As long as the Muslim population remains around 1% of any given country it will be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a threat to anyone...."

Here is where it becomes interesting. Note throughout the exponential scale of Islamic influence as the percentage of Muslim population per country increases. Comments in square brackets are my corrective interjections.

United States: 1.0
Australia: 1.5
Canada: 1.9
China: 1.0-2.0
Italy: 1.5
Norway: 1.8

"At 2% and 3% they [Muslims] begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs."

Denmark: 2.0
Germany: 3.7
United Kingdom: 2.7
Spain: 4.0
Italy: 4.6

"From 5% on they [Muslims] exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. They will push for the introduction of halal ("clean" by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature it on their shelves - along with threats for failure to comply (United States)."

France: 8.0
Philippines: 5.0
Sweden: 5.0
Switzerland: 4.3
The Netherlands: 5.5
Trinidad & Tobago: 5.8

"At this point, they [Muslims] will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves under Sharia, or Islamic law. The ultimate goal of Islam is not to convert the world but to establish Sharia law over the entire world.

"When Muslims reach 10% of the population, they will increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions (Paris - car burning). Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result in uprisings and threats (Amsterdam, Denmark - Mohammed cartoons, murder of Theo van Gogh)."

Guyana: 10.0
India: 13.4
Israel: 16.0
Kenya: 10.0
Russia: 10.0-15.0

The one anomaly in this set of statistics is Israel, which has not experienced uprisings and threats of violence. Its Arab or Muslim population enjoys equal political rights with Jewish Israelis. The suicide bombings and rocket attacks that have killed hundreds have been perpetrated by outsiders.

"After reaching 20% [of a population] expect hair-trigger rioting, Jihad militia formations, sporadic killings and church and synagogue burning:

Ethiopia: 32.8

"After 40% you will find widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks and ongoing militia warfare:"

Bosnia: 40.0
Chad: 53.1
Lebanon: 59.7

"From 60% you may expect unfettered persecution of non-believers and other religions, sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon and jizya, the tax placed on [conquered] infidels:"

Albania: 70.0
Malaysia: 60.4
Qatar: 77.5
Sudan: 70.0

"After 80%, expect state-run ethnic cleansing and genocide:"

Bangladesh: 83.0
Egypt: 90.0
Gaza: 98.7
Indonesia: 86.1
Iran: 98.0
Iraq: 97.0
Jordan: 92.0
Morocco: 98.7
Pakistan: 97.0
Palestine: 99.0
Syria: 90.0
Tajikistan: 90.0
Turkey: 99.8
United Arab Emirates: 96.0

I question the inclusion of "Palestine" in this set. "Palestine" simply means space occupied by stateless "Palestinians" in Gaza and the West Bank, and is the name of the state which Islamists wish to replace Israel, once it is destroyed. Turkey, after decades of having a secular, non-religious government, is beginning to turn "religious," and seems to be yearning for the kind of Muslim government that cleansed the country in 1915 of non-Muslim Armenians in a genocide that predates the Holocaust.

"100% will usher in the peace of ‘Dar-es-Salaam' - the Islamic House of Peace' [more correctly, dar-al-Islam, or Land of Islam]. There is supposed to be peace because everybody is a Muslim."

Afghanistan: 100.0
Saudi Arabia: 100.0
Somalia: 100.0
Yemen: 99.9

"Of course, that's not the case. To satisfy their blood lust, Muslims then start killing each other for a variety of reasons.

"'Before I was nine I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; and the tribe against the world and all of us against the infidel.' Leon Uris, The Haj.

"It is good to remember that in many, many countries, such as France, the Muslim populations are centered around ghettos based on their ethnicity. Muslims do not integrate into the community at large. Therefore, they exercise more power than their national average[s] would indicate.

"Adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond's book, Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat."

Hammond's book is sponsored by the Frontline Fellowship, a Christian organization, and the book itself was published by Christian Liberty Books. The Frontline website contains several endorsements of the book by clerics and missionaries. The quoted paragraphs above were "adapted" from Hammond's book (by whom, is unknown), and not very professionally. The statistics themselves were compiled by the CIA and used in the book.

The first paragraph of the Frontline ad for the book reads:

In his masterful second volume study of Hitler, Hitler, 1936-1945: Nemesis, Ian Kershaw discusses a phenomenon called "working towards the Führer," in which every Nazi Party organization, member and office automatically, with little or no prompting or prodding by Hitler or his inner circle, worked to realize the ends and policies articulated by Hitler before and after he rose to power in 1933. It was automatic, because to disagree with or have reservations about a single, even minor aspect of Nazi ideology was to court reprimand, censure, dismissal, or even death. Agreement with those ends and policies was nearly a secondary motivation behind any Party member's actions. He was compelled to act, regardless of the consequences. The ideology commanded it, and the Führer's will and vision were irresistible, because there was little or no self to resist them.

As Party members who disagreed or expressed reservations were dismissed, or abandoned the Party, fled, committed suicide, or were murdered, monsters of the first rank filled the vacuum to formulate and enact policies that more completely "worked towards the Führer," monsters such as Heinrich Himmler, Hermann Göring, Joachim von Ribbentrop, and Joseph Goebbels. When all the checks within the Party against total irrationality in domestic and foreign policies were removed or fell into disrepute, total irrationality took over totally.

But the average Party member strived to satisfy Hitler, regardless of how minor or major the action and regardless if it stood to be acknowledged or rewarded. To be a true, loyal, above-suspicion Nazi meant the near total surrender of one's ego, mind and self, and to substitute them with Hitler's own.

Of course, an Ellsworth Toohey might say that the joke was on the rank-and-file Nazi: he would claim that Hitler was essentially selfless, and that what little mind Hitler possessed was founded on what he thought his followers and "the people" wanted and expected of him as prophet and dictator. Ayn Rand, in The Fountainhead, describes that phenomenon through Toohey:
"...A world of obedience and of unity. A world where the thought of each man will not be his own, but an attempt to guess the thought in the brain of his neighbor, who'll have no thought of his own but an attempt to guess the thought of the next neighbor who'll have no thought - and so on...around the globe. Since all must serve all. A world in which man will not work for so innocent an incentive as money, but for that headless monster - prestige. The approval of his fellows - their good opinion - the opinion of men who'll be allowed to hold no opinion. An octopus, all tentacles and no brain....An average drawn upon zeroes...." (1).

It is no accident or fluke of history that Islamists - Hamas, Hezbollah, Ahmadinejad, Saudi Wahhabists, the whole ménage of Islamists and Jihadists -- admire both Hitler and Nazism. Their hatred of Jews and Israel is merely one facet of that pathology. As Nazism required the complete submission of the individual to Party ideology and an unthinking, unwavering deference to Hitler, Islam requires the complete submission of the individual to Islam and an unthinking, unwavering deference to Allah and Mohammed. Islamists have long recognized that both the method and the ends of Nazism were in complete agreement and practical accord with their own. The "mechanics" of a functioning Islam differ in no fundamental way from the "mechanics" of a functioning Nazism or any other brand of total collectivism, as described by Toohey above. (2)

(One historical note: Kershaw points out that Hitler once entertained the idea of solving the "Jewish Question" by helping to establish a Jewish state in Palestine, where all German and other European Jews would be forcibly "relocated" and presumably - hopefully - perish in a wasteland of desert and hostile Arabs. He dismissed the idea because he feared that such a state could possibly become a political adversary dedicated to destroying Germany. Historically, the ironic joke is on Hitler. He destroyed Germany and the Jews turned the wasteland into a productive, prosperous garden.)

With that in mind, here is a set of significant statistics forwarded to me by a friend. It charts the progression of Islamic Jihad, both soft and hard methods, whose purpose is to establish a global caliphate, especially in the West.

It begins by stating:
"Islam is not a religion nor is it a cult. It is a complete system."

I would disagree. It is definitely a religion and a political system combined. Any attempt to "separate" mosque and state would emasculate Islam. I have argued this point in past commentaries and will not dwell on it here. And cults, if not opposed by reason and kept by it on the far fringes of a civilized society, have a tendency to become religions that may become state policies. Ecology was once a "cult." Today we have the Environmental Protection Agency.

It goes on to state:
"Islam has religious, legal, political, economic and military components. The religious component is a beard for all the other components."

Or a mask, or a ruse. But no one should doubt how seriously Islamists and Muslims in general take the religious component. Islam is a barbaric but fully integrated system, perhaps more lethally integrated than was Nazism.
"Islamization occurs when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to agitate for their so-called ‘religious rights.'"

I would defend anyone's right to believe in Islam. The question is: How could one truly practice Islam without declaring Jihad on others? After a Muslim has won the "internal struggle" or Jihad within himself, the next step is to wage it against all others. To refrain from that part of Jihad is to risk the accusation of being a slacker or pseudo-Muslim. From the first stage to the last, all such effort constitutes "working towards the Prophet and Allah."
"When politically correct and culturally diverse societies agreed to ‘the reasonable' Muslims demands for their ‘religious rights,' they also get the other components under the table. Here's how it works (percentages source: CIA: The World Fact Book, 2007).

"As long as the Muslim population remains around 1% of any given country it will be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a threat to anyone...."

Here is where it becomes interesting. Note throughout the exponential scale of Islamic influence as the percentage of Muslim population per country increases. Comments in square brackets are my corrective interjections.

United States: 1.0
Australia: 1.5
Canada: 1.9
China: 1.0-2.0
Italy: 1.5
Norway: 1.8
"At 2% and 3% they [Muslims] begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs."

Denmark: 2.0
Germany: 3.7
United Kingdom: 2.7
Spain: 4.0
Italy: 4.6
"From 5% on they [Muslims] exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. They will push for the introduction of halal ("clean" by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature it on their shelves - along with threats for failure to comply (United States)."

France: 8.0
Philippines: 5.0
Sweden: 5.0
Switzerland: 4.3
The Netherlands: 5.5
Trinidad & Tobago: 5.8
"At this point, they [Muslims] will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves under Sharia, or Islamic law. The ultimate goal of Islam is not to convert the world but to establish Sharia law over the entire world.

"When Muslims reach 10% of the population, they will increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions (Paris - car burning). Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result in uprisings and threats (Amsterdam, Denmark - Mohammed cartoons, murder of Theo van Gogh)."

Guyana: 10.0
India: 13.4
Israel: 16.0
Kenya: 10.0
Russia: 10.0-15.0

The one anomaly in this set of statistics is Israel, which has not experienced uprisings and threats of violence. Its Arab or Muslim population enjoys equal political rights with Jewish Israelis. The suicide bombings and rocket attacks that have killed hundreds have been perpetrated by outsiders.

"After reaching 20% [of a population] expect hair-trigger rioting, Jihad militia formations, sporadic killings and church and synagogue burning:

Ethiopia: 32.8
"After 40% you will find widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks and ongoing militia warfare:"

Bosnia: 40.0
Chad: 53.1
Lebanon: 59.7
"From 60% you may expect unfettered persecution of non-believers and other religions, sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon and jizya, the tax placed on [conquered] infidels:"

Albania: 70.0
Malaysia: 60.4
Qatar: 77.5
Sudan: 70.0
"After 80%, expect state-run ethnic cleansing and genocide:"

Bangladesh: 83.0
Egypt: 90.0
Gaza: 98.7
Indonesia: 86.1
Iran: 98.0
Iraq: 97.0
Jordan: 92.0
Morocco: 98.7
Pakistan: 97.0
Palestine: 99.0
Syria: 90.0
Tajikistan: 90.0
Turkey: 99.8
United Arab Emirates: 96.0

I question the inclusion of "Palestine" in this set. "Palestine" simply means space occupied by stateless "Palestinians" in Gaza and the West Bank, and is the name of the state which Islamists wish to replace Israel, once it is destroyed. Turkey, after decades of having a secular, non-religious government, is beginning to turn "religious," and seems to be yearning for the kind of Muslim government that cleansed the country in 1915 of non-Muslim Armenians in a genocide that predates the Holocaust.
"100% will usher in the peace of ‘Dar-es-Salaam' - the Islamic House of Peace' [more correctly, dar-al-Islam, or Land of Islam]. There is supposed to be peace because everybody is a Muslim."

Afghanistan: 100.0
Saudi Arabia: 100.0
Somalia: 100.0
Yemen: 99.9

"Of course, that's not the case. To satisfy their blood lust, Muslims then start killing each other for a variety of reasons.
"'Before I was nine I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; and the tribe against the world and all of us against the infidel.' Leon Uris, The Haj.

"It is good to remember that in many, many countries, such as France, the Muslim populations are centered around ghettos based on their ethnicity. Muslims do not integrate into the community at large. Therefore, they exercise more power than their national average[s] would indicate.

"Adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond's book, Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat."

Hammond's book is sponsored by the Frontline Fellowship, a Christian organization, and the book itself was published by Christian Liberty Books. The Frontline website contains several endorsements of the book by clerics and missionaries. The quoted paragraphs above were "adapted" from Hammond's book (by whom, is unknown), and not very professionally. The statistics themselves were compiled by the CIA and used in the book.

The first paragraph of the Frontline ad for the book reads:
"Dr. Peter Hammond's new book...is a fascinating, well illustrated and thoroughly documented response to the relentless anti-Christian propaganda that has been generated by Muslim and Marxist groups and by Hollywood film makers...."

For a detailed exposé of Islam's Marxist affiliation - as distinguished from its symbiosis with Nazism - see Daniel Pipes' "[The Islamist-Leftist] Allied Menace," of July 15th.

So, regardless of the book's Christian orientation, the statistics Hammond uses to cite the various Muslim populations in each country can be taken as reliable, as well as the prefatory remarks before each set of percentages. There is certainly a demonstrable and observable corollary between a country's Muslim population and the influence it begins to have or has had on its government, politics and culture.

The Islamists are coolly "working towards the Prophet and Allah" as shown in the numbers above. Meanwhile, our policymakers appear to be a succession of compliant, pragmatic, non-judgmental zeroes blindly working towards the conquest and extinction of the West.

(1) The Fountainhead, pp. 667-668, Plume-Penguin Centennial Edition.
(2) "During the 1930s, Palestinian Arabs under the leadership of the Hajj Amin al-Husseini, the Mufti of Jerusalem, had embraced a great deal of Nazi ideology." From Denis MacEoin's "Tactical Hudna and Islamist Intolerance," Middle East Quarterly, Summer 2008.

Family Security Matters Contributing Editor Edward Cline is the author of a number of novels, and his essays, books reviews, and other nonfiction have appeared in a number of high-profile periodicals. Feedback: editorialdirector@familysecuritymatters.org.

For a detailed exposé of Islam's Marxist affiliation - as distinguished from its symbiosis with Nazism - see Daniel Pipes' "[The Islamist-Leftist] Allied Menace," of July 15th.

So, regardless of the book's Christian orientation, the statistics Hammond uses to cite the various Muslim populations in each country can be taken as reliable, as well as the prefatory remarks before each set of percentages. There is certainly a demonstrable and observable corollary between a country's Muslim population and the influence it begins to have or has had on its government, politics and culture.

The Islamists are coolly "working towards the Prophet and Allah" as shown in the numbers above. Meanwhile, our policymakers appear to be a succession of compliant, pragmatic, non-judgmental zeroes blindly working towards the conquest and extinction of the West.

(1) The Fountainhead, pp. 667-668, Plume-Penguin Centennial Edition.
(2) "During the 1930s, Palestinian Arabs under the leadership of the Hajj Amin al-Husseini, the Mufti of Jerusalem, had embraced a great deal of Nazi ideology." From Denis MacEoin's "Tactical Hudna and Islamist Intolerance," Middle East Quarterly, Summer 2008.

This was a comment by Nasseem, a muslima to boot, as she describes herself, on one of our postings that I figured to answer it on the front page for the benefit of all muslims, and our readers.

As we always say, no one exposes islam, better than muslims, and islam itself, of course.
 
Nasseem said (unedited): "Assalamau Laikum Hal, I am no christian....only a good human being and muslima to boot and there's lot of good muslims in this world...but you peoples will never allow us to have this. For me christianity is childish. Throughout history who ever gets slapped on the cheek makes the instigator pay...one way or another...they don't turn the other cheek....this is against human nature. Stay your hand if you want to...but then don't worry or complain about repeatedly being slapped on both sides....if that's your fate...and of course others love you for it....hey that's your outlook, but it's not going to be mine. Also I think it's a hard enough concept to pray to a god....and christianity wants you to pray to a ghost as well...I mean how wierd is the concept of trinity. Thirdly...christianity is male domianted...there's a male god who has a male son (only)...where's the daughter(s) in this story? There's virtually no femaninty in christianity...where as in Islam womens are given pride of place and proper respect. So...I simply could not be or convert to christianity...I cannot belong because of the lack of respect for us womens."

Dear Nassem, I would like to thank you for your contribution with your comments, and also invite all muslims to  our open forum, and un-moderated comments section to express freely their opinions. We are here to learn, and reach for the truth about islam. No one is better placed than muslims to teach us and answer our questions. Even when muslims don't answer our questions, it proves to be the best answer that confirms the facts we expose.. 

As for stating that you're not a Christian, you don't need to say it. Your language and your state of mind exposes you. I mean your Islamic mind, which is apart from the normal human mind. It’s not me saying this, but your “most honorable” prophet, stating that muslim women are “deficient in religion and brain,” and the Koran puts your value at half a man. And I take it for granted that you agree. Otherwise you won’t be a “muslima to boot.”

Actually, your prophet also compared you with dogs and donkeys, and allowed your husband to beat you, So definitely, with all these attributes, you can’t fool anyone and pass for a Christian.

Christianity elevates every person, men and women. The God of the Bible said, "He created man on His own image, and created Eve to be “A helper comparable to him. Genesis 1:18.”

You see, God said “Comparable,” not half, but comparable to the man, not to dogs and donkeys that should be beaten. And how would you qualify this saying of your prophet, " The woman advances and retires in the shape of a devil. From Sahih Muslim, the book of Nikah (intercourse), book 8 #3240,” in the pride of place, or proper respect section?

That should answer your “Christianity is male dominated.” 

Do you know that your allah forgot completely to mention Hawa (Eve), that's not very considerate for the muslim women, don't you agree? Can you imagine yourself not knowing who your mother is, or what's her name? Some people use a very bad word for that. And Can you tell us how you came up with the name of Hawa (Eve), since there is no trace for it in the koran?

And do you think it's nice from your prophet to say that, “the majority of people in hell, are women.” Do you agree with him? And how would you know if you're in the minority? You don't even speak arabic, the language of Jannah (islamic papradise) to start with, that's already a minus. Why allah would choose you and have a communication problem? Isn't it odd that allah made arabic the official language for a religion he wanted it to be international, to end up in a Jannah of sex and booze, where no one will have time for talk ... heheheheee .. Funny allah. 

And who you gone talk to, do you think your father, your husband, or any men in your family that wakes up at 4 A.M. to go to the mosque, struggle every day with the five prayers, fast ramadan, and spend their life saving to go to the Hajj, are doing all this to leave 72 virgins and talk or care about you in jannah? Your complaining about the place of femininity in Christianity, when islam gave you a 1/4 man on Earth, not counting the unlimited right hand possessions your husband is allowed to have, and 1/73 up there, that's if you make it and sneak in with the minority. If that's what you call pride, then you know something that we don't know, and we respect your freedom of expression.  

But to be a Christian, you'll need a deep brain clean up first, starting by throwing the book that treats you like an animal to be beaten, your Koran, where it belongs, in the garbage, and be completely cured. There are better books now to teach animals how to behave without beatings, that will make many muslim women dream of a better life. You can verify that at animals clinic sites, or convert to Brigitte Bardot's (Peace be upon her) animals society.  

Besides, who asked you here to be a Christian? We’re here to talk about the religion of truth. However, you, same as every muslim, do all you can to stir away the conversation from islam for reasons we perfectly understand. After all, who would want to talk about a plague, and what can they say? Unless for once you prove me wrong and enlighten us with the goodies that we might have missed, or we didn’t grasp. You also have the opportunity here to correct our misunderstanding if we said something wrong, or “out of context,” and guide us to, “The right path.”

But you never amazed us by refuting anything we posted here; you only used what became the trademark of every muslim, the weapon of mass distraction, Christianity. Not realizing that by doing this, you betray yourself by believing in something that you can’t defend, and unintentionally, confirm that there is nothing to refute in everything we posted.
 
So I’ll tell you what I tell every muslim, if Christianity is wrong, why waste your time talking about it, instead of guiding people to the religion of truth? And talking about corrupted religions won't make islam right and clean by default, and won’t change the fact that your “most honorable” prophet is a pedophile, a caravan robber, a rapist, a killer, and a gangster making his bread and butter with his sword. All that by his own admission, and from your books.

But your books don’t only serve as references, unfortunately. They also serve to spread muhammad's legacy. That’s why the statistic records from ALL Western jails, show that muslim guests are by far the most represented group, between rapists, thieves, killers, terrorists, pedophiles and best of all a good assortment of very devout sheiks and imams.
 
What better reference would anyone ask for, when 3% of a total muslim population, on average per Western country, produces 40% of criminals. And that’s by being politically, and stupidly correct. Can you imagine what the percentage would’ve been if Western governments were instead, legally correct?  

The other reason we don’t discuss Christianity, or any religion, is simply because we're not in the comparative religions business. If you want religion, go to religious sites, same as when you want to learn French, you don’t go to a plumbing site, and here we deal with plumbing in the sewers of islam, don't you feel the smell?

Besides, it would be very unfair to debate islam and mohammad from a Christian perspective, How could we judge Muhammad, a pedophile that brought doom, destruction, and shed the blood of other people, by the standard of Jesus, a sinless (that's from your koran), The Prince of peace that brought the good news, and shed His own blood for other people. One was a butcher; the other was called The Healer and raised the dead. You see my point, it would be like putting the rope around muhammad’s neck from the start, and condemning him without the need of any further evidence.

I can resume it in one sentence: Jesus divided history while muhammad divided the world (house of muslims, and the others to be killed, robbed, raped, cursed, destroyed, and enslaved).

And while we're at it, why your koran testified that Issa Al Massih (Jesus) is sinless? No one is sinless but God. That makes Issa equal to God, and put you in very deep trouble, with one of three choices. Either Issa is God, or you're associating someone else with God, and that makes you Mushrekoon (polytheists), or allah made a mistake by making Issa his equal. I advise you to run to the closest mosque, and ask the most learned imam, and come back to us with the answer, that's if he doesn't make you recite, koran 5:101, which boils down to, don't ask, don't think, and stay dumb.

For your statement, “there’s lot of good muslims in the world," I applaud your choice of “good” muslims, and not “true” muslims. But have you any idea what's costing the Western tax payers, to finance round the clock the monitoring of mosques, and Islamic communities by all their law enforcement agencies just to keep those “good” muslims from becoming “true” muslims, emulating your role model muhammaf?

And how many “good” muslims will be left if your Islamic authorities abrogate the apostasy law and differentiate islam from the Mafia? In my opinion, the Islamic authorities should seek inter-faith dialogue with the Mafia; they too apply the apostasy law and share many common values with islam.

As for “the teaching of turning  the other cheek,” Imagine if the Bible had something like this, "Kill all who do not believe in Moses and Jesus," do you think any muslim would've been left on the face of the Earth by now? Let me put it to you in a different way. If a dog bite you, and you bite him back, if a thug slap you and you slap him back, if a robber rob your house and you go to rob his house, etc, etc. Where would it end? And where is the superior teaching in this, and what new teaching mohammad came up with? That's the law of jungle, and animals didn’t need a prophet to teach them that.

You said, "It's against human nature, to turn the other cheek." And you were perfectly right on the money, but I know you didn't realize the meaning of what you said. By saying this, you, from your own mouth, condemned mohammad and your koran, and expressed in the most explicit way, what we always say, that mohammad's teaching and your koran have nothing superior to any base human teaching, or gang teaching.

As the French say, "The most beautiful woman can't give more than what she has." So what teaching can you expect from a gangster, not only, making his bread and butter by robbing innocent people with his sword, but making a religion out of it, that you call it great, praise him every time you mention his infamous name, and strive to emulate him to finish the job. Which is to continue robbing and extorting the world, and that's what your koran is all about, to compensate for your own self inflicted misery and destitution. 

No muslim country can advance, motivate people to work and make them focus to produce, if they blast them five times a day, starting at four in the morning with sounds from thousands of loudspeakers, piercing their brains with a deafening and interminable "Allah Akbar (allah the greatest), Hayo Ala'l Jiahd (Get ready and let's go for the jihad). Add to this their supplications, which they call prayers, seventeen times a day, to curse and damn the unclean kafers Christians and Jews, combined with their imams vociferations to "make their children orphelins, make their property and their women booty for the muslims (since allah is the same God of the Bible, so they say, that's why raping Jewish and Christian women is halal) ...," and you can imagine what is left, not only in their brains, but their whole beings, after these promises of robbed riches and dreams of rape orgies, to think about any work or the need to produce anything at all.      

By the same token, you proved, again unintentionally of course, that the Bible teaching is not only superior to human morality which confirms its divine nature, but aims to elevates the person above his base instincts, to perfection. While islam makes muslims act no different than, animal rage boys.

That's why; the Western world, regulated by laws inspired from that teaching, created the most advanced civilization in the world, "The Judeo-Christian Civilization," that is superior, productive, guaranteeing civil order, and without it, you muslims would’ve been exterminated by hunger and disease in a matter of few years. Just imagine Nasseem, if the Western world treated you eye for an eye according to your standard, and your islamic Ummah don’t get, as charitable donations, all the medicines, just to name one item, discovered by those Jews and Christians. Could you survive on camel's urine and fly wings, as mohammad advised you? I won't ask you to answer that, I know it would be mission impossible. It's just meant to be food for thoughts, if you ever have the luxury of any thoughts to feed, and meditate on.

You also exposed, without realizing, the lies of your Koran, which stated that mohammad came, “To Perfect the morality of people.” To perfect, means to complete shortcomings, to accomplish something that was not finished, and bring it to complete perfection.

From the evidence we have, we can attest that the only thing mohammad perfected, is making perfect fools of all the people that are still being fooled by him, and I credit him for that perfect accomplishment. Let’s compare what existed before Muhammad.

Jesus said “love your enemies, bless those who curse you, do good to those who hate you, and pray for those who spitefully use you and persecute you. For if you love those who love you, what reward have you? Therefore you shall be perfect, just as your father in heaven is perfect? Matthew 5:44, 46, 48.”

Now, can you tell us what Muhammad added, and perfected above this level, or what there is to perfect beyond that?

I will help you and answer this question, from muhammad’s blueprint:

Koran 16:126, “If ye punish, then punish with the like of that wherewith ye were afflicted.”

It is obvious, as you stated, that Muhammad and allah didn’t come up with anything new, other than what has been practiced throughout history but not anymore by the civilized world. You should be proud that Muhammad and allah’s morality reached your level.

In other words, mohammad took you backward, and you don’t need him for this, just watch jungle movies or rage boy, and go by your instinct, and you’ll be a model muslima.

But here is a hard question for you that, again, I doubt you can answer, for it will simply destroy Muhammad and his koran’s teaching by your own verdict:

Let's say your brother raped a girl, do you agree that the raped girl’s brother should apply  “punish them as they did to you,” and rape you? 

As you know, this happened in Pakistan, your own country, and you surely saw the local and international outrage it caused, and the Office of the Public Prosecutor instituted criminal proceedings against the executors of this vendetta. The international outrage is understandable, but why in Pakistan they condemned what they called, "tribal code of honor, which includes the notion of vendetta and tit for tat punishment?" What is koran 16:126 is, if not "tit for tat punishment?"

This is the ultimate irony, muhammad's koran is condemned by none other, than your own courts and people for the trash it is. You see Nasseem, that I wasn't lying when i said it's not me saying it's garbage? I'm just the messenger.

I meant to make this rape question personal to you instead of making it generic, to have your truthful answer when you fall under allah's law. Of course, you have the options to call an imam, ask your islamic audience, or use verse 3:28 from the "very" holy koran, that tells you to fool these idiots, "childish," kafers.
 
The knock out

The prophet that you (muslims) say, “came to perfect the morality of people," didn’t even reach the standard of your own morality, or even respect what he himself said, “punish them as they did to you,” but went well below that, and didn’t have neither moral, nor standard.

There is numerous quotations from the sayings of muhamad and his Koran to prove it, but I’ll mention just one for now, not to give you an indigestion. In islamic countries they make you read your islamic texts and recite them, but never ask you to understand them.

Let's get back to Koran 16:126, “punish them same as they did to you.” It implies that no punishment is due to someone that didn’t attack you, and you shouldn't punish someone for the actions of someone else, you agree? I guess you do, if not let me know. But you'll have to agree, because I took this answer from your own Koran 6:164: 

“Every soul draws the meed (wage) of its acts on none but itself: no bearer of burdens can bear the burden of another.”

In tafsir (interpretation) El Tabari, it explains practically the same think, that allah will judge everyone according to

his own acts and deeds, and won’t put on him, or hold him accountable for the sins of others. Sounds fair to

me, which is the basis of all civilized laws, and even ordinary human wisdom with a sense of justice. Anyone

disagree on that? Just a side note for all muslims, in case you don’t know, muhammad plagiarized this from 

Moses law (The Torah), so he didn’t invent the wheel to get it right.  

The incriminating evidence

Sahih Muslim, Book 037, Number 6668:

Abu Burda reported Allah's Messenger (May peace be upon him) as saying: There would come people amongst the Muslims on the Day of Resurrection with as heavy sins as a mountain, and Allah would forgive them and He would place in their stead the Jews and the Christians.

This is what we call, parading muhammad the thug, and the allah he made on his own image, nude, topless and bottomless, out in the cold. Actually, we're not the ones doing it, we just put the islamic texts under the microscope, and let them do the job.

This hadith is simply stating that your allah will open his den, and gather to him all muslim criminals, "with sins heavy as mountains,” not to judge them for their sins, but to cheat justice, and put their sins and deeds on Jews and Christians.

Isn’t this the unequivocal proof that your allah is the lowest and most vile corrupt judge?

First your allah perjured himself according to his own Koran 6:164, and 16:24, ” no bearer of burdens can bear the burden of another,” and he swore in different quotations that the Koran is the book of truth, that he himself guarded from corruption.

The definition of perjury:

-The act or crime of knowingly making a false statement while under oath or bound by an affirmation or other officially prescribed declaration that what one says, writes, or claims is true.
-Deliberately giving false testimony
-Criminal offense of making false statements under oath
-The willful giving of false testimony under oath or affirmation.

Under the penal code of any civil law, muhammad and his accomplice, allah, would be convicted with several crimes: acquitting criminals, and putting their crimes on other people. This is a very serious case of perjury, incriminating innocent people, falsification of evidence, false accusations, and misleading justice. It's the biggest masquerade of justice.

allah "the best of deceivers."

Is this is your god, that you call, “the most merciful," or a scumbag filthy deceiver? But again, he wasn’t lying when he admitted in the koran that he was, “the best of deceivers." It is also one of the beautiful 99 names of your allah. Give him credit for being honest about being a deceiver.

Imagine any legal system, even in the banana countries, having a judge like this? He would’ve been buried under an anonymous banana tree by now. Too bad they don't have banana trees in Arabia.

I guess Nasseem and all muslims should praise allah and mohammad, for sparing them the shame of having the godfathers of their cult behind bars for all these crimes, had they’ve been alive. Besides, we would’ve been accused of being islamophobic.

I hope Nassim that now you’re convinced that what you call, your “very” holy book, have nothing holy. Again, It’s not me saying this; it’s your allah’s own admission in Koran 4:82:

“Do they not consider the Qur-an. Had it been from other than Allah, they would surely have found therein much discrepancy."

If this is not a monumental, not only discrepancy, but criminality, then what is it? This is another confirmation, from your allah himself that it's garbage. 

If the Michelin Guide Company rates garbage, they wouldn't have enough stars for the koran. 

And this is just the tip of the iceberg, Stay tuned.

For comparison sake, I offer this to you, and all muslims, from the Bible. See the difference and you be the judge, which is the authentic book:

Proverbs 17: 15:
“Acquitting the guilty and condemning the innocent— the LORD detests them both.”

This is a clear condemnation of allah, for being detested by the true God. In other words, evil. Would anyone dare, in light of this, to say that Allah is the same God of the Bible?

Jeremiah 17:10:
"I the LORD search the heart and examine the mind, to reward a man according to his conduct, according to what his deeds deserve."

This is for all muslims to watch out, don’t be deceived by what Muhammad tells you, no Jew or Christian will take your place, you snooze, you loose.

Jeremiah 32:19 (Whole Chapter)
“great are your purposes and mighty are your deeds. Your eyes are open to all the ways of men; you reward everyone according to his conduct and as his deeds deserve.”**Now you know what the real deal is. I won’t tell you don’t come back crying if you go for the scam, there is no coming back, but at least for compensation, you’ll be in the company of Momo and all the criminals of the Ummah, to make you feel at home.

As for us, we prefer hell if your allah’s Jannah (Islamic papradise) will gather the killers, the suicide bombers, the beheaders, the thieves, the rapists, and all the filth and scumbags of the Earth in his Islamic brothel. No hell would compare with the hell of being with that gathering. Besides, who would trust being in a place where all you muslims are gathered together, in a brothel with free booze, and brain deficient women on top of that? It’s déjà vue. No thank you, I’ll pass. 

As they say, a picture is worth a thousand word, and this one definitely proves it.  

Should we call it, "Pride and Ecstasy or Agony and Ecstasy?" You be the judge. 

http://www.sonsofapesandpigs.org/2008/05/answering-nassem-a-muslima-to.html

More honoring Islam.Islam deserves to be honored for this.I mean lets THINK ABOUT the reasons one would NEED to have sex with an INFANT or any other small child........Sorry i can't think of a single one except that they are mentally deficient.Islam id sick and vile and disgusting i HATE the religion of Islam.It's politics and laws suck the terd too.

Islam stands here sooooo proud of the fact that they molest children,must be a grand old feeling to have sex with an infant,bet you feel like really big men...huh? Momma and daddy must be so proud of their holy and pious son.What a sick religion,you disgust me. You should be so ashamed as to run and hide your faces.Everything about you says you can only prey on the weak and defenseless,such strong men Allah protects with his might.Pathetic.You are disgusting ,you don't deserve sub human status you pompous asses.You holier than thou pig sty wallowing pieces of shit.

I would so love Five minutes alone with your sorry pathetic asses.No hidden message here,no attempt to to spare any feelings the short of it is i would shove YOUR head up your ASS!!!! I would do it with pleasure.I would just quite simply beat you and beat you and beat you............

Having sex with underage children is popular in sharia countries. Find out why?

ALLAH APPROVES OF IT

65.4 “If you divorce your (child) wife before she reaches menstruation age her idda is three months”.

According to this aya a muslim man can marry (and have sex with) even a one day old infant girl.

ISLAMIC AUTHORITIES PROMOTE IT

There is no argument on this point among Islamic authorities whether shia or sunni. They all agree that a muslim man can have sex with baby girl.

This is what Imam Khomeini, the top shia authority says:

“A muslim man can have sexual pleasure with a little girl as young as a baby. But he should not penetrate her vaginally, however he can sodomize her”. (Tehriro vasyleh, fourth edition, Qom, Iran, 1990)

Here is what the the top sunni authority click here---> says  ( do not miss this )(video on a Saudi website) about having sex with a one day old baby girl. (Go to “site video” and click on sex with a one day old girl)

PROPHET LOVED LITTLE GIRLS

Prophet had special feelings for cute little baby girls.

• Ibn Ishaq: Suhayli, 2.79: In the riwaya of Yunus Ibn Ishaq recorded that the apostle saw Ummu’l-Fadl hen she was baby crawling before him and said, ‘If she grows up and I am still alive I will marry her.’ ( p. 311)
• Muhammad saw Um Habiba the daughter of Abbas while she was fatim (age of nursing) and he said, "If she grows up while I am still alive, I will marry her." (Musnad Ahmad, Number 25636)

  BABY AISHA

  Our prophet fell in love with Baby Aisha when she was shown by Allah to him in his dreams when she still an infant.
  

  Bukhari , Volume 7, Book 62, Number 15:
  Narrated 'Aisha:
  Allah's Apostle said (to me), "You have been shown to me twice in (my) dreams. A man was carrying you in a silken cloth(as an infant) and said to me, 'This is your wife.' I uncovered it; and behold, it was you. I said to myself, 'If this dream is from Allah, He will cause it to come true.'"

  
  COURTSHIP WITH AISHA

  Whenever Prophet visited Abu Bakr house he made Aisha sit in his lap and played with her.
  

  
  PROPOSAL FOR MARRIAGE
  

  When Ayesha reached the age of 6 Prophet decided to ask for her hand.

  Abu Bakr: Rasulullah you must be joking. She is hardly six years old. And you are in your fiftees.
  

  Prophet: She is old enough for me.
  

  Abu Bakr: Didn’t you marry off your own daughters when they were much older.?.
  

  Prophet: That was before aya 65.4 was revealed. Now a muslim can marry even a day old infant girl.
  

  Abu: “But Rasulullah you called me your brother , how can you marry your foster niece”.
  

  Prophet:” But you are not my real brother you are only a “ brother in Islam”.”*
  

  Muslim Book 62, Number 18:

  Narrated 'Ursa:
  The Prophet asked Abu Bakr for 'Aisha's hand in marriage. Abu Bakr said "But I am your brother." The Prophet said, "You are my brother in Allah's religion and His Book, but she (Aisha) is lawful for me to marry."
  

  Abu: “But Rasulullah, last week you turned down Hamza’s daughter (who was ugly and in her teens) . You said you cannot marry your foster niece**.
  

  Bukharihari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 37:

  Narrated Ibn 'Abbas:
  It was said to the Prophet, "Won't you marry the daughter of Hamza?" He said, "She is my foster niece (brother's daughter). "
  

  Prophet: “Allah had shown her to me in my dreams, that was Allah’s indication for me to marry her, I am helpless in this matter”.

  
  ABU BAKR THROWS IN A MONKEY WRENCH
  

  Abu was concerned about the welfare of her tiny tot sleeping with a horny and hefty old man who was given the libido of 30 men by Allah..
  

  Abu: “I will let you marry her only on one condition, you will have to abstain from having sexual intercourse with the little one before she turns 9”.
  

  Prophet was disappointed but he had no choice.
  

  Prophet: “O.K. but I will not abstain from using other halal methods of pleasuring.”

  
  AISHA MADE A BEAUTIFUL BRIDE**

  PROPHETIC PLEASURING  ( I just mentioned these things in one of my last posts)
  

• Thighing
  

  Sahih Dawood Book 1, Number 0270:

  Narrated Aisha, Ummul Mu'minin:
  One night prophet entered upon me and said: Uncover your thighs. I, therefore, uncovered both of my thighs. Then he put his cheek and chest on my thighs.
  

  Fondling

  Bukhari,Volume 1, Book 6, Number 299:

  'Aisha said: "Whenever Allah's Apostle wanted to fondle me, he used to order me to put on an Izar and start fondling..
  

  Daydreaming

  Bukhari, Volume 7, Book 71, Number 660:

  Narrated Aisha:
  “Allah's Apostle used to think that he had sexual intercourse while he actually had not”
  

  The Bottom-line

  Bukhari, Book 002, Number 0572:

  Aisha said “ Whenever I found dried semen on the garments of the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him), I scraped it off with my nails.
  

  
  AISHA TURNS NINE
  

  Allah was very happy for the prophet when finally Aisha turned nine.. He sent Gibraeel to congratulate him and to witness the consummation. Prophet introduced Allah’s envoy to Aisha .
  

  Bukhari, Volume 5, Book 57, Number 112:

  Allah's Apostle said (to me), 'O Aish ('Aisha)! This is Gabriel greeting you.' I said, 'Peace and Allah's Mercy and Blessings be on him, you see what I don't see' " She was addressing Allah 's Apostle. (only prophets can see angels)
  

  
  MENTION OF HOLY CONSUMMATION IN HADITHS
  

  • Sunan Abu Dawood Vol3 Bk36 N0 4917:
    Then they brought me to the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) and he had sexual intercourse with me . I was nine years old.
    
  • Sunan Nasai Bk of Marriage, No 3256:
    A'ishah said: The Apostle of Allah peace be upon him married me when I was six and had sexual intercourse with me when I was nine and I was playing with dolls.
    

  
  ALLAH BLESSED THEM WITH INSPIRATIONS
  

  Although Prophet slept with hundreds of slave girls captured women and concubines in addition to his large number of wedded wives, Allah only sent quranic revelations to prophet when he slept with Aisha.
  

  Aisha said “Inspiration came to him when he and I were in a single blanket”. (Tabari Vl7, page: 7)
  

  Bukhari Vol. 5 Bk57 N 119:
  Prophet said, By Allah, the Divine Inspiration never came to me while I was under the blanket of any woman except Aisha.”

  
  Modern reality of Islamic pedophilia:

  A PEDOPHILE CONVERTS TO ISLAM  ( Does this article look familiar? It should.It is the one i posted that led to my web site being labeled a hate site.Good to know there are haters like me.)
  

  When a pedophile found out that sex with children is halal and Sunna he converted to islam and changed his name to Mohammed. Here is the news from England.
  

  Paedophile changes name and converts to Islam in jail

  Daily Record.co.uk,
   Apr 7 2008,
  Exclusive by Amy Devine

  A pedophile has converted to Islam and changed his name behind bars. Paul Falconer, 40, now insists bosses at Peterhead prison call him Mohammed.

  Note: The conversation between Abu Bakr and Muhammad is fictitious.

  

•  

•  http://www.islam-watch.org/AyeshaAhmed/Pedophilia-Islam-Allah-allowed-Prophet-Muhammad-Practised.htm